News
The headline is correct; the court held unanimously that a straight woman who claimed she was discriminated against by her ...
The lawyer who successfully argued Ames v. Ohio says the real win is for even-handed law, not for dismantling DEI.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson — arguably the Supreme Court’s most progressive member — emphasized that the text of the law ...
All eyes are on the Supreme Court as it issues this term’s final flurry of opinions — some of which concern hot-button issues ...
I am not suggesting that discrimination cannot go the other way. It is conceivable that a minority group can discriminate ...
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the "background circumstances" rule, which held major-group employees to a higher ...
Explore more
The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.
4d
The Root on MSNLegal Experts: How U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling on ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Will Make Things Worse For Black AmericansAttorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.
The Supreme Court ruled requirements for discrimination lawsuits do not vary based on if the plaintiff is a member of the ...
Latin Times on MSN6d
Supreme Court Lowers Bar for ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Lawsuits by Majority EmployeesThe Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a straight woman in Ohio who filed a “reverse discrimination” lawsuit against her ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results