President Trump wants an alternative to the World Health Organization: how should we respond?
Much attention has rightly been placed on how to fill the World Health Organization’s funding gap if and when the US withdraws. Kent Buse and colleagues argue that President Trump’s idea to establish a parallel structure is equally insidious as withdrawing from WHO Some things are much better done together,
More than half of Americans believe the U.S. benefits from its membership in the WHO. As of April 2024, 25% of U.S. adults say the country benefits a great deal from its membership, while about one ...
The World Health Organization is shaped by its members: 194 countries that set health priorities and make agreements about ...
Too few leaders have learned the critical lesson that international cooperation is essential to pandemic prevention, ...
President Trump’s decision to clean house at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and initially freeze all ...
World Health Organization officials declared the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak -- later to be dubbed COVID-19 -- a public ...
Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been told to halt all communication with the World Health ...
If the U.S. withdraws funding and support from WHO, critical programs that support the survival of women and children will be at risk.
President Trump’s decision to pull out of the international health agency could deprive the United States of crucial ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback